Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Game Links Gallery
Go Back   Joystick Required Forums > Jumpgate Evolution Forums > Jumpgate Evolution General Discussion
About This Page About This Page: This is a discussion on It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP within the Jumpgate Evolution General Discussion forums, part of the Jumpgate Evolution Forums category, at Joystick Required Forums. Originally Posted by daslog Your original point was that you won't necessarly got shot at on an open PvP server. That's simply nonsense. Yet in 5 years of
Welcome to Joystick Required! Membership is easy and its free! And membership removes this giant ad space.

View Poll Results: Consensual or non-consensual
I want to choose when I can get killed (consensual) 23 36.51%
I want to be able to kill or be killed at any time (non-consensual) 40 63.49%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 08-31-2007, 04:40 PM   #61 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 505
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Sephiroth is on a distinguished road
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Quote:
Originally Posted by daslog View Post
Your original point was that you won't necessarly got shot at on an open PvP server. That's simply nonsense.

Yet in 5 years of Jumpgate when I haven't actively seeked combat I haven't been shot... so your "guarantees" are simply nonsense. Please, FFS, stop presenting your OPINION as FACT. They are yet to be one and the same so far, so you may as well give it up now because it's irritating as hell.
Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


Old 08-31-2007, 04:44 PM   #62 (permalink)
Big Daddy
 
Jump's Avatar
 
Pilot Name: JumpDemon
Faction: Solrain
Joystick: MS FF2
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tracy, Ca.
Posts: 7,036
Jump has a spectacular aura aboutJump has a spectacular aura about
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) -->Jump<!-- google_ad_section_end --> is a Solrain pilot
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Ok kids stop fighting and slinging mud or I will have to test my new secret weapon. Everyone presents opinion as fact when talking about game play, it is all subjective. Now move on from it.
__________________
Currently working hard to break the server...

>> Help support JSR through our Amazon store
Jump is offline  Send a message via ICQ to Jump Send a message via Yahoo to Jump Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 05:18 PM   #63 (permalink)
Member
 
Pilot Name: daslog
Joystick: sidewinder
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: new hampshire uber alles
Posts: 351
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
daslog is on a distinguished road
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jump View Post
Ok kids stop fighting and slinging mud or I will have to test my new secret weapon. Everyone presents opinion as fact when talking about game play, it is all subjective. Now move on from it.
IMO, I apologize. In the future, I will start every post with IMO (starting with this one) so I don't confuse seph. As a token gesture, I will go back and edit all of my posts with IMO to clarify them, if asked.
daslog is offline   Send a message via AIM to daslog Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 05:52 PM   #64 (permalink)
Cadet
 
Pilot Name: SlimPickns
Joystick: marble trakball
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 79
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
SlimPickns is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

When i play Jumpgate Evolution i hope its non-consensual PvP,,,,,,

I will play it, anyway its made,,,

I came to Jumpgate, only after my other 24/7 fps worlds were fubar...

I have stayed, because theres no cheaters.. or not enough to mater..

I could of made, or tried to influence the game before the last MLT patch, but i did not.. I was into save the universe by mining and not paying attention to pvpers goin to pot. For not being a,,, ahhhh,, viable target to yous, I promise, i will in the future.. I will take your ores, your stocks, your everything.. i am so tired of youall. i could just blow up all the Knockers...

Does the previsos statememt mean anything, if its not non-consensual?

They after me nuts,,, maw...


I had that once,
In prison.
SlimPickns is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 06:37 PM   #65 (permalink)
Member
 
Pilot Name: dailatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London UK
Posts: 401
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
dailatron is on a distinguished road
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
rofl, so then daslog, explain to me then why since I've returned to the game a couple months ago and put on pirate tags to suit my rebel RP and allow me to be in a multifactional squad the only time I've been shot at is when I actively seeked PvP (despite hauling equipment, commodities, and mining all wearing pirate tags while passing enemy pilots). Just because someone can shoot you down doesn't necessarily mean they will. Experience in JUMPGATE (the game which really matters in this particular discussion) has told me that.

And it's not just now either, years ago when I played I have never been shot while hauling or otherwise. I've never been attacked when I wasn't "consenting" to it. I've only ever been shot when I was looking for PvP.

Since that is the case, and since I could care less about other MMOGs, I'm going to go with MY experience in the matter.
Could it be that PvPers as a general rule dont shoot each others haulers, miners and usualy work on some sort of a consensual PvP ROC ?. That isnt the case for CIV rippers.

And for everyone that uses the saying wrong. Its, COULD NOT care less.
dailatron is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 07:16 PM   #66 (permalink)
Cadet
 
Faction: Solrain
Joystick: Worn out MSFF2
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 46
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
feldman is on a distinguished road
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) -->feldman<!-- google_ad_section_end --> is a Octavius pilot
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

I say non-consensual. If you keep em bunching up their butt cheeks regularly it leads to a society with buns of steel!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELPIRATA View Post

1. Twinky, killed my tow while I was in Gurge during the Sol Navy vs OEC war. Twinky was a 2nd account of somebody and out of the blue and in reg space, wiithout saying a word started to fire untill I died. I never saw the account online after that.


ELP
Twinky was not a second and still plays with Navy on other games.
feldman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 07:48 PM   #67 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 505
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Sephiroth is on a distinguished road
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jump View Post
Ok kids stop fighting and slinging mud or I will have to test my new secret weapon. Everyone presents opinion as fact when talking about game play, it is all subjective. Now move on from it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by daslog View Post
IMO, I apologize. In the future, I will start every post with IMO (starting with this one) so I don't confuse seph. As a token gesture, I will go back and edit all of my posts with IMO to clarify them, if asked.
.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by dailatron View Post
Could it be that PvPers as a general rule dont shoot each others haulers, miners and usualy work on some sort of a consensual PvP ROC ?. That isnt the case for CIV rippers.

And for everyone that uses the saying wrong. Its, COULD NOT care less.

Well that isn't the point dail, the point is despite the fact that people could have shot me since the game allows it and I wasn't shot at then the statement "if you can be shot, you will be shot" is false. And either way, how many true civ rippers have you seen in Jumpgate? Because honestly there have been very, very few. I mean just look at all the haulers and miners who have posted in these debates that they've been civ ripped like 3-4 times or something in their 7 years of Jumpgate, I'd say that's a pretty damn good record.
Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 08:49 PM   #68 (permalink)
Moderator
 
ELPIRATA's Avatar
 
Pilot Name: ELPIRATA
Faction: non-aligned
Joystick: Saitek X45
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carolina, PR
Posts: 1,498
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
ELPIRATA is on a distinguished road
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) -->ELPIRATA<!-- google_ad_section_end --> is a Octavius pilot
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

@Feldman: Twinky did not had Sol Navy tags when he ripped me and that I remember... we didnt had him on the hostile list. If he wanst a second, he did something that only second accounts would.

Anyways, the point is.. I've been killed in a cargo ship like 3 times, in 7 years.

@Daslog: The problem with 2 servers is that you'll never have the same people on them, so you can't make a point about who is better or worse. Having safezones dont mean that you'd have what it takes to prove the point, cause those that want unconsensual PvP will be on the other side, and the safezone server will be like walk in the park, without worries at all, well, except for the AI, which.. is not the problem.

ELP
ELPIRATA is offline  Send a message via ICQ to ELPIRATA Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 09:14 PM   #69 (permalink)
Member
 
Pilot Name: daslog
Joystick: sidewinder
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: new hampshire uber alles
Posts: 351
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
daslog is on a distinguished road
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELPIRATA View Post

@Daslog: The problem with 2 servers is that you'll never have the same people on them, so you can't make a point about who is better or worse. Having safezones dont mean that you'd have what it takes to prove the point, cause those that want unconsensual PvP will be on the other side, and the safezone server will be like walk in the park, without worries at all, well, except for the AI, which.. is not the problem.

ELP
In my opinion,

I don't understand what you are saying. It doesn't really matter if the same people would be on both servers to me.
__________________
IMO, the above post represents the opinion of the author. No warranty is given or implied.
daslog is offline   Send a message via AIM to daslog Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 09:19 PM   #70 (permalink)
Member
 
Pilot Name: Wild_Bill
Faction: Octavius
Joystick: MS Sidewinder Precision Plus
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Abilene Texas
Posts: 800
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Wild_Bill is on a distinguished road
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) -->Wild_Bill<!-- google_ad_section_end --> is a Octavius pilot
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Scorch I wish you had put in a third option: The ability to choose the level of danger.

To me consentual PvP is MT/HG. Non-consentual would be Pirates. The reg/unreg means levels of danger to me. I'm not in favor of civ-chips or even Safe Zones. Safeer Zones perhaps, but varing levels of the danger of non-consentual PvP would be my choice. Good monetary or RP reasons to go to Unreg would be the easiest choice for Jumpgate Classic. What's going to happen in Jumpgate Evolution is still very much up in the air as near as I can tell.

I'm with Montaugh on the AI vs PC issue. I accept the AI danger but to know a real person wants to ruin my day seriously (insert expletive verb of your choice) me. I don't play to ruin other folks enjoyment and I don't see why they should ruin mine.

And like SlimPickens, I will play it however it's made.
Wild_Bill is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2007, 10:40 PM   #71 (permalink)
Member
 
dahalb's Avatar
 
Pilot Name: dahalb
Faction: Solrain
Joystick: None
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 416
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
dahalb is on a distinguished road
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) -->dahalb<!-- google_ad_section_end --> is a Solrain pilot
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP

Pirates aren't necessarily out to ruin anyone's day. There are a few pirates i can remember that were PoD pirates who were quick nice folks, didn't charge a lot (100k or something) and were just trying to have fun themselves.
Playing a bad guy means that occasionally that do bad things. Its the RP not the person. I think sometimes we forget that RP and the person are not necessarily one and the same.

Anyway, as i see it, the only difference between and AI death and a PvP death is the time it takes to die. If you get killed by a civ they are automatically tagged as a pirate after the fact and if your anything like me you keep a list of dangerous ppl Just add them.

In over 5 years of playing (breaks included), i've been ripped once and i don't even remember who it was it was that long ago. There was no danger for me whatsoever in the end so I ran a fully artied Tug all over the damn map cause if anyone did try and take me out, i had two nukes and one helluva shield. If they got me good luck to 'em.

There's one other thing too, that someone mentioned. Your Rep. SlimPickns was never a target for Vae Victis because we knew him and his Rep. InterOrka was a target for Vae Victis because we knew him and his Rep. He didn't really complain tho. He put up a fight and never backed down. Your rep used to be your currency in game....whatever happened to that?!
__________________
"A probable impossibility is preferable to a improbable possibility" -Aristotle
"Easy to learn, Hard to master" - Unknown
dahalb is offline   Reply With Quote