![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 505
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Quote:
Yet in 5 years of Jumpgate when I haven't actively seeked combat I haven't been shot... so your "guarantees" are simply nonsense. Please, FFS, stop presenting your OPINION as FACT. They are yet to be one and the same so far, so you may as well give it up now because it's irritating as hell. |
|
|
||
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Ok kids stop fighting and slinging mud or I will have to test my new secret weapon. Everyone presents opinion as fact when talking about game play, it is all subjective. Now move on from it.
|
||
|
__________________
Currently working hard to break the server... >> Help support JSR through our Amazon store |
||
|
||
|
|
|
Member
Pilot Name: daslog
Joystick: sidewinder
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: new hampshire uber alles
Posts: 351
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
IMO, I apologize. In the future, I will start every post with IMO (starting with this one) so I don't confuse seph. As a token gesture, I will go back and edit all of my posts with IMO to clarify them, if asked.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Cadet
Pilot Name: SlimPickns
Joystick: marble trakball
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 79
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
When i play Jumpgate Evolution i hope its non-consensual PvP,,,,,,
I will play it, anyway its made,,, I came to Jumpgate, only after my other 24/7 fps worlds were fubar... I have stayed, because theres no cheaters.. or not enough to mater.. I could of made, or tried to influence the game before the last MLT patch, but i did not.. I was into save the universe by mining and not paying attention to pvpers goin to pot. For not being a,,, ahhhh,, viable target to yous, I promise, i will in the future.. I will take your ores, your stocks, your everything.. i am so tired of youall. i could just blow up all the Knockers... Does the previsos statememt mean anything, if its not non-consensual? They after me nuts,,, maw... I had that once, In prison. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Member
Pilot Name: dailatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London UK
Posts: 401
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Quote:
And for everyone that uses the saying wrong. Its, COULD NOT care less. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Cadet
Faction: Solrain
Joystick: Worn out MSFF2
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 46
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() ![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
I say non-consensual. If you keep em bunching up their butt cheeks regularly it leads to a society with buns of steel! Twinky was not a second and still plays with Navy on other games.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 505
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well that isn't the point dail, the point is despite the fact that people could have shot me since the game allows it and I wasn't shot at then the statement "if you can be shot, you will be shot" is false. And either way, how many true civ rippers have you seen in Jumpgate? Because honestly there have been very, very few. I mean just look at all the haulers and miners who have posted in these debates that they've been civ ripped like 3-4 times or something in their 7 years of Jumpgate, I'd say that's a pretty damn good record. |
|||
|
||
|
|
|
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
@Feldman: Twinky did not had Sol Navy tags when he ripped me
and that I remember... we didnt had him on the hostile list. If he wanst a second, he did something that only second accounts would.Anyways, the point is.. I've been killed in a cargo ship like 3 times, in 7 years. @Daslog: The problem with 2 servers is that you'll never have the same people on them, so you can't make a point about who is better or worse. Having safezones dont mean that you'd have what it takes to prove the point, cause those that want unconsensual PvP will be on the other side, and the safezone server will be like walk in the park, without worries at all, well, except for the AI, which.. is not the problem. ELP |
||
|
||
|
|
|
Member
Pilot Name: daslog
Joystick: sidewinder
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: new hampshire uber alles
Posts: 351
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Quote:
I don't understand what you are saying. It doesn't really matter if the same people would be on both servers to me. |
|
|
__________________
IMO, the above post represents the opinion of the author. No warranty is given or implied.
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
Member
Pilot Name: Wild_Bill
Faction: Octavius
Joystick: MS Sidewinder Precision Plus
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Abilene Texas
Posts: 800
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
![]() ![]() |
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Scorch I wish you had put in a third option: The ability to choose the level of danger.
To me consentual PvP is MT/HG. Non-consentual would be Pirates. The reg/unreg means levels of danger to me. I'm not in favor of civ-chips or even Safe Zones. Safeer Zones perhaps, but varing levels of the danger of non-consentual PvP would be my choice. Good monetary or RP reasons to go to Unreg would be the easiest choice for Jumpgate Classic. What's going to happen in Jumpgate Evolution is still very much up in the air as near as I can tell. I'm with Montaugh on the AI vs PC issue. I accept the AI danger but to know a real person wants to ruin my day seriously (insert expletive verb of your choice) me. I don't play to ruin other folks enjoyment and I don't see why they should ruin mine. And like SlimPickens, I will play it however it's made. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Re: It's not PvE vs PvP it's consensual PvP vs non-consensual PvP
Pirates aren't necessarily out to ruin anyone's day. There are a few pirates i can remember that were PoD pirates who were quick nice folks, didn't charge a lot (100k or something) and were just trying to have fun themselves.
Playing a bad guy means that occasionally that do bad things. Its the RP not the person. I think sometimes we forget that RP and the person are not necessarily one and the same. Anyway, as i see it, the only difference between and AI death and a PvP death is the time it takes to die. If you get killed by a civ they are automatically tagged as a pirate after the fact and if your anything like me you keep a list of dangerous ppl Just add them. In over 5 years of playing (breaks included), i've been ripped once and i don't even remember who it was it was that long ago. There was no danger for me whatsoever in the end so I ran a fully artied Tug all over the damn map cause if anyone did try and take me out, i had two nukes and one helluva shield. If they got me good luck to 'em. There's one other thing too, that someone mentioned. Your Rep. SlimPickns was never a target for Vae Victis because we knew him and his Rep. InterOrka was a target for Vae Victis because we knew him and his Rep. He didn't really complain tho. He put up a fight and never backed down. Your rep used to be your currency in game....whatever happened to that?! |
||
|
__________________
"A probable impossibility is preferable to a improbable possibility" -Aristotle "Easy to learn, Hard to master" - Unknown |
||
|
||