[TRI News Bot]

Originally Posted by GM_Istvan on JOSSH Forums

After two years, now what?

Two years ago today, I had the great good fortune to be brought on board the Jumpgate project. Scott Brown originally hired me to help with finishing Episode 2, a very urgent priority back in November 2002. Gradually, I've taken on a greater share of the load. After the Episode 2 patch released, I was permitted to get involved with coding, and I took on most of our general bug fixing. By the end of 2003, I was doing the majority of the fixes and features going into each patch. Though I make no business decisions for the game, for some time now I've had full responsibility for the direction and development of Jumpgate. As a former beta tester, my involvement stretches back to January 2000. As a player, I founded Jumpgate's first major trading squad, played politics, participated in PvP, downed my share of conflux, mined my share of roids, immensely enjoyed simply flying as a merchant pilot, and waited hungrily like everyone else for the next patch. For a player, joining the project as a developer was a dream come true, a dream I still strive to share with my fellow Jumpgate players by keeping our mutual hopes and dreams for the game in mind whenever I consider new features or changes.

In the past, and especially while I still lacked influence in Jumpgate development, I publicly described the work I was doing to change and improve Jumpgate in terms of "taking baby steps". As the juniormost member of the team at the time, I did not want to make mistakes that would create additional work for my coworkers, I especially did not want to damage or disrupt the game by my actions. It seemed necessary to go slow, and to be careful. For various reasons, I believe the time for caution with respect to Jumpgate development is past.

We are all aware that Jumpgate faces harsh challenges from newer, flashier game releases that are enticing players away from our community. We also know that there persist flaws in Jumpgate, as in any game, that can frustrate players and help convince them to move on. Attracting new players to a game released long ago (as the game industry measures time) is very difficult, and requires resources that are literally unavailable. Without resources, change is also slower for Jumpgate than for games that can afford to have dozens, even hundreds of people on the development team. We all know what these constraints have meant for the Jumpgate community over the last three years.

Jumpgate's history is a reflection of some difficult realities of business in the game industry. The situation we face has less to do with Jumpgate itself, and more to do with business pressures NetDevil now has little control over. Our limitations have come as a result of past decisions made with the best information available at the time, and with NetDevil's best interests at heart. NetDevil surely would not exist today were it not for the successful release of Jumpgate in 2001, but NetDevil's prosperity has for a while not been tied to Jumpgate's success or failure. Yet, for that transition to have taken place, NetDevil's focus as a company has necessarily been shifted to other projects, and that change of focus is why NetDevil is a successful and growing company today.

NetDevil is proud of Jumpgate, and no one here at NetDevil wants to see Jumpgate continue to fade slowly away. Jumpgate is a landmark game in the industry: It remains the only massively multiplayer design dedicated to HOTAS ("Hands On Throttle And Stick") spaceflight simulation. Other online space games are either flight simulators capable of handling only limited numbers of players (like Microsoft's Allegiance), are massively multiplayer games that use a mouse-click interface (like EVE Online), or dilute the flight simulator into a component of an otherwise stat-based point-and-click game (SWG:Jump to Lightspeed). Jumpgate also remains remarkable for its practical blend of real physics with modifications to keep the simulation flyable and fun. Unlike any other game, Jumpgate is entirely about the player flying his own ship: no autopilot, no time dilation, no crutches. Jumpgate flight is grounded upon player skill.

I've spent nearly five years thinking about how to make Jumpgate better, and two of those years actually working to try to carefully improve the game. It's time to step beyond the caution, to move beyond the framework I inherited from those who created Jumpgate and worked on it before me. It's past time to take risks, because I believe that the path Jumpgate has been on for the last two years is not enough to sustain us.

I've hinted to the community about changes that I have had in mind. They do us no good on paper, as thoughts, or as good intentions. They will only help Jumpgate if they are implemented, and to do that, I must cross an important hurdle that has limited my ability to move Jumpgate forward: I must break my fear of damaging my predecessors' work.

Jumpgate's survival demands change, and to make any substantial change to Jumpgate I am going to have to call into question many things that we as players of the game have always taken for granted, or considered fundamental, even sacrosanct. This cannot help but create some disruption. I cannot help but make mistakes. I am going to need help. I'm going to lean on the Test Program members harder than ever before, because I am going to begin breaking things. Important things. Things the game needs in order to work right. If you are an active player with time on your hands, and if you feel you can maintain the trust of being a part of the test team under the conditions I detailed in this thread, please apply. I'm already recruiting additional testers from the pool, and I'm going to need more of you.

Jumpgate has always been labelled as a "Spaceflight and Combat Simulator". One of Jumpgate's great attractions has always been its emphasis on PvP activity. Some steps have been taken over the past year and a half to improve the cross-factional balance for PvP. Since my own background emphasized the trading parts of Jumpgate, I've also tried to correct some problems with the game's economy, though certainly a number of problems remain. However, I now consider the creation of a factional warfare system to be the most pressing need to bring to Jumpgate some new interest, action, and hopefully new players. Because so many parts of the game are interrelated, creation of a warfare system is almost certainly going to affect insurance, bounties, political ratings, and flight registry tags, among other things. The kill-handling system and the missions system are going to have to be adjusted, too. Several major new mechanisms are going to have to be created and balanced. For instance, a system for damaging and disabling buildings, which are currently indestructible, is going to be needed. Jumpgate was originally "The Reconstruction Initiative". It's past time to give players ways to tear things down, as well as real ways to build them up again. Meanwhile, I don't want to desert the needs of the non-PvP players. I will need to figure out ways to keep the other parts of Jumpgate from being overwhelmed or sidelined when I broaden PvP gameplay. Regardless, the overall feel of Jumpgate that we have all become used to is likely to be heavily changed. That's going to scare people. It should. I want you to know that it scares me, too.

After two years of getting comfortable as a Jumpgate developer, I think it's time to try some things that are scary. Climb in, sit down, and hold on, folks. I think the ride is going to get bumpier before things get better. I hope you decide that the eventual results turn out to be worth any pain we encounter along the way. Maybe taking these risks now is foolish. Some people will undoubtedly say that big changes now are foolish, and will only finish Jumpgate off.

I say, may fortune favor the foolish.

Link to original post by GM_IStvan on JOSSH Forums

[Jump]

Well I say go for it. What have you got to lose? No matter what you do, someone is going to whine and someone is going get upset and leave. So you might as well do what needs to be done.

[Jump]

Once I get through Christmas, I’m going to attempt to reinstate my account in support of Istvan's determination to save this game. If I wasn't on disability going into Christmas, I would do it immediately. I have stated often that I love this game, maybe it's time to put up or shut up. I will put aside my severe distaste for Themis in support of my respect for Istvan. Reading his emotional post has tipped the scales for me.

Lots of us say we love Jumpgate but we sit back and let it fade away. Yes there are many "newer" and "prettier" games out there. Yes there are lots of Jumpgate imitations in development out there. But right here, in our midst, we have the real deal. The one we all compare them to, is here now, available to us.

Obviously, Istvan’s bold declaration is a sign that the game is in trouble and NetDevil doesn’t want it to be that way. Obviously, they are at the precipice of financial reality with this game. It’s do or die time, for Jumpgate, and its community. It is time to take some chances, risking all, to save this game. I take this as a definite sign from NetDevil that they are committed to a future for this game. So I will be committed to its future as well.

All I have to give is my $9.95 a month. That may not seem like much in the big scheme of things. But if everyone that professed to love this game, and is able, reinstated their account, then maybe Istvan would have someone at his side, maybe more. I’ve tried to support the game through tools and Jumpgate destinations for the search engines. But that doesn’t do any good as there is no one left to use them. So come January, I will do what needs to be done and reenlist. I hope you find it in your heart to put aside your differences and wipe the buildup for your visors, and do the same fellow pilots.


Jump

[Ambrosius]

Originally Posted by Jump

Once I get through Christmas, I’m going to attempt to reinstate my account in support of Istvan's determination to save this game. If I wasn't on disability going into Christmas, I would do it immediately. I have stated often that I love this game, maybe it's time to put up or shut up. I will put aside my severe distaste for Themis in support of my respect for Istvan. Reading his emotional post has tipped the scales for me.

This is MOST EXCELLENT news. I think Istvan's recent post was "invigorating" because I believe its message was not only that Istvan remains solidly behind the success of Jumpgate, but I think there was also an indication that ND has not given up on it/us either.

[Romulus]

Jump, I will restart also with you. It's time to dust off the Cobwebs out of the ****pit and wax the ship.

[Jump]

Originally Posted by Romulus

Jump, I will restart also with you. It's time to dust off the Cobwebs out of the ****pit and wax the ship.

hmm, I don't remember having any wordlist turned on. *scratches head.*


Well that's one more. Any more "loly gager pantywaste, playing point and click random number generator games", slackers going to accept the challenge?

Come on. You know playing those "made for the masses" games is making you puke. Quit dreaming of Jumpgate and get real. Stop wishing the pathetic game you are playing is more like Jumpgate. It won't ever be Jumpgate.

Save a mouse, play Jumpgate.

[Jump]

Oh, you do realize that my -=MACK=- days are over. I will either be going unsquaded or start some new squad.

[Tim]

Sounds about right for a new years resolution... i'll see you guys in space next month

[Jump]

Cool! That's another sleepy head waking from the slumber. Come on in an grab a cup of Joe. I know it's rough out there. But the bad days are soon to be over old friend.

[Romulus]

No problem on u losing your Tags. I am MACK Through and Through.

[GrimGriz]

Good, people to haul around the crap I've been mining

Ofcourse, I credit the resurgence of interest to my rejoining, and not any post Istvan made. If I wasn't egocentric I wouldn't be GrimGriz, now would I?